Inked Path: A new or older way
Amongst the frames
No: A mad dash for the door to tell the line just told. The first one was way better.
Reporter: At least no madness here, only the fear of the small. Back to the post.
Steel: WHY!?
Torch: Now that a moment has allowed a frozen response to be taken. May truth escape to the cabin walls, though it would sound as if the walls were talking. There was a crow that had been met on the path. That endured a path with no sound, having no idea of the sounds that echo in the new woods. The newest addition to the Woods around the cabin is the Bird that spoke. And looking for a door home.
Old man: Well, back to find other things. The Speaker has frozen.
Torch: So, unseal the path home, and all is gone. No dust here or there, as it was heard. Please forget not a report is waiting on a steady line for the move to attack those inside. Even if it was once home.
Nostos: What is going on?
1st piece of puzzlement: The Rodeo Takeover.- Inked Path: A New or Older Way
Away-Ink: Becoming the clown Bonkers
Bessie: Ads have run, and bills are paid. Now, let’s have a quick conversation before returning to the movie, becoming the clown bonkers.
Empiric: That’s right. The second type of dream imagery brought up earlier was the word “bar.” In the movie, it was to hold off on deciding by asking a question, by passing a tape recorder of the words heard by Jobo Lage to an unnamed extra in the film.
Bessie: That’s right, they need to ask. Is that correct? This could indicate a conflict in thinking since the two are playing pool. In the realm of dreaming, this can be debated in terms of what it means.
Empiric: Now, considering the differences of a pool hall, which is a competitive environment, and the desire to achieve a goal, alternatively, the bar suggests a barrier or a need to question things.
Bessie: In the movie, it could be said that the scene represents thinking. This plays out the goal that is to be achieved, which is in conflict because Bonkers believes the information is being misinterpreted.
Empiric: And that mental conflict is the breaking point for Jobo Lage to have a conversation with a friend.
6th piece of puzzlement: The Rodeo Takeover.- Inked Path: A New or Older Way
Mitchel: Was there a pause in the movie?
Jon: I could swear it was the pause and not the mute button.
Mitchel: Wow!
Terry: Now the pause has been hit. Returning to the floor, why was Inkle sitting in a cage?
Inkle: Isn’t it called a cyclorama?
Terry: Sorry about that. Thanks for the catch.
Inkle: What’s the difference? Both refer to an enclosed space.
Terry: Enclosed spaces, such as cycloramas and cages, and open spaces serve different purposes and offer distinct advantages depending on the context and intended use. A cyclorama is a specialized type of enclosed space often used in photography and videography. It features a curved wall that creates the illusion of infinite space, making it ideal for creating seamless backgrounds. Key advantages include seamless backgrounds, lighting flexibility, and versatility. Cycloramas can be used for a variety of projects, from product photography to film shoots, and can be customized with different lighting setups to achieve various moods and effects. A cage, on the other hand, is an enclosed space within a larger facility. It is surrounded by physical barriers and offers enhanced security and privacy. Enhanced security, customization, and control offer more governance over the environment compared to a cyclorama, which is more cost-effective.
Jon: That was a very coherent answer. Could it be repeated?
Vaticinator: In the given answer, why is there a need for better security with the cage?
Terry: As pets know, there is an owner who can see the room where the cage is placed. While the barrier of bars or glass does not hide the owner, this allows for flexibility of the cage that is not present with the cyclorama. At the conclave, glass that allows the infinite space to be seen inside provides a magnifying effect for the owner to better see their pet.
Jon: Back to the floor; these answers are too good.
Terry: Okay. What has been happening in the movie?
Mitchel: Rewind the movie to the bar scene, and Bonkers provides an answer to the posed question, allowing a chance to see the missed part of the film.
Inkle: Good reasoning for the rewind, but hold on before pressing the button. As the questions are still needed, aspects need to be rounded out in the appendix of the work.
Terry: Well, that is the reason for writing down the thoughts so there can be a conversation where each passes the work one to the right, and the questions had or insights given for the writing can be done, and then refined before debate ensues. The questions about the cage and cyclorama are valid as they clarify the meaning. A good question would be about the way they use “fiefdom,” which means a space that is controlled.
Vaticinator: It’s the truth. A space inhabited by Mitchel or Inkle becomes controlled. Inhabitants that are meant to be controlled by one now have two controllers, which will cause problems.
Terry: Would that mean each of the three is akin to a feudal lord?
Vaticinator: A feudal lord could be said not to be in the traditional sense, as it is not a realm or region being controlled. The domain or fiefdom becomes a pocketed dimension for the entity that inhabits the given space.
Terry: Can the space work with an imbrication of the three using limited control?
Mitchel: If the given space is defined enough, the overlapping space could become a point of intense views that give things away, meaning a good way of discussing the space is needed.
Terry: Hence the need for the writing work of the group. The writing work will be the first major building block for the cyclorama to remain in control. Those writings provide a guideline for the cyclorama and a rule structure for those keeping the narrative going forward. With those kinds of things brought to the forefront, to keep things organized going forward.
Puzzlement: The rodeo takeover.
2nd piece of puzzlement: The Rodeo Takeover.- Inked Path: A New or Older Way
Used Or Not: New skills reviewed by Olsen.
The eye is treated to a piece that has been seen before. Learning a new set of skills is essential for any work. To enhance the toolkit here, it requires more than just web skills; it involves building a better and more comforting design for the reader. The art will also improve, which will contribute to the reader’s enjoyment. The following piece draws the eye directly to the face that is shrouded by the hood, giving the exposed part a more masked actor effect. In the cloudy space of the deep blue that fills the gaps between the purple blocks, the idea of an onlooker watching the masked actor adds depth to the interpretation. A hand pulls both colors into a hand shape, serving as a guide to the next part of the piece, where a feeling of being lost takes over in the flames. Until it spits out the word “the,” and then drifts across the piece to the word “end.”
3rd piece of puzzlement: The Rodeo Takeover.- Inked Path: A New or Older Way
Late to the party
Why the lateness?
And then what happened?
And then?!
Easy peas need a slushy after.
Drop-cart. Slushy
4 Sons mug, what?
A RAT! IS COOLER A RAT!
4th piece of puzzlement: The Rodeo Takeover. – Inked Path: A New or Older Way
The Clone Did It: Five Missing at Baby Lake
Richard Avant: What does the Waiting…
Amila Leap: It would seem the case file is of a wife gone missing from the docks. Where Lucy Losi also works. In the report, the wife should have been home two hours before Rachel and four hours before Jothan disappeared.
Richard Avant: There was no water to be seen, but all went missing near water. At least the three givens.
Amila Leap: Is or can a map be seen?
Linda Canox: Why have the conversation with Ted?
Jenny Homes: It was the seating on the bench by BIA. Alrighty, Bert the cook. Off to follow the caravan of news stations for the missing person report.
Cook: The tie together is good, but one or the other. Be safe, come back tomorrow for a meal.
Jenny Homes: Will this be worth the time getting here?
That’s Right. It would seem the son of Rye Low has… Gone missing at this time. Assigned to the case are Avant and Leap of the BIA, as said.
Jenny Homes: It would have been better to have stayed home, but the repeat was helpful. Only saw the leads didn’t get to be questioned other than by an officer.
Jenny Homes: Leap and Avant, the two leads of the investigation, are… How would a BIA agent build the string out? What would be the ties? No, no. Try not to get lost in the report, and need to build a better one. Wishing not to be the same.
Jenny Homes: The first conversation in the park was with the b-ball player, and finding out the two would go to pedagogic well, better to say conducted by the one, who was also the one missing two hours before. Why is there a gap in time? Why does the body of water between the two feel like a known that is hacking legends? The. The. Oh, the old yarn, or what was it called? It was something about water.
Richard Avant: There are four given points on the map; oddly, the loops overlap somewhat.
Amila Leap: The quickness of the comment regarding where Lucy worked from Julan is unnecessary to know.
Richard Avant: It was, and I didn’t think of it then…
Amila Leap: Could there be a legend hiding in the case?
Richard Avant: That might be a bit too much.
Amila Leap: What if it isn’t? Thinking about “The No Running by the water.”
Richard Avant: That would present a different view that challenges the mind.
5th piece of puzzlement: The Rodeo Takeover.- Inked Path: A New or Older Way
The Quibbles of the Scribbles.
Dusty: This text is a chaotic mess! It jumps from one idea to another without any clear direction. The “Amongst the Frames” section is just a jumble of thoughts, with characters like Steel and Torch making cryptic statements that don’t add up. The mention of a crow and a cabin adds to the confusion. It’s like the author threw random ideas together without any coherence. And what’s with the “Rodeo Takeover”? It’s supposed to be a series, but each piece is disjointed and lacks a clear narrative. The “Away-Ink” part is just bizarre, with characters discussing dream imagery and pool halls. It’s frustrating to read!
Bard: How is it forgotten that the cabin and the bird were last week? The text is rich with imagery and creativity. Steel and Torch’s dialogue, though cryptic, adds depth and intrigue. The crow and cabin create a mysterious atmosphere that draws the reader in. The “Rodeo Takeover” series, despite its disjointed nature, has a connection if looked at; the pieces do fit together. The “Away-Ink” part, with its discussion on dream imagery and pool halls, provides an interesting take on mental conflict and interpretation. It’s a thought-provoking piece.
Dusty: Thought-provoking? It’s more like thought-confusing! The text lacks structure and clarity. The characters’ dialogues are scattered and don’t contribute to a cohesive story. The “Cyclorama vs. Cage” discussion is overly technical and doesn’t fit with the rest of the text. The “Rodeo Takeover” pieces are just random snippets that don’t form a coherent narrative.
Bessie: While it may seem scattered, the text offers a unique blend of ideas and perspectives. The “Cyclorama vs. Cage” discussion, though technical, adds an interesting dimension to the narrative. Since Hume and Carlin post the difference of size explored in Away-Ink, the concept of enclosed spaces and their purposes, which can be seen as the explanation of world-building. The “Rodeo Takeover” pieces are just that, a puzzle to be found out till the To-Boga Posting.
Bard: There is the answer to the confusion by Dusty. It has been a long time since a review of the work has been given of the work.
Bessie: What of the gallery added in the ropes so far?
Dusty: Has this been turned from kind guidance by tearing apart the work to an advert for reading more of the post?
Bard: Yes, because there is a lot to read here, and deciding it all by one post gives no context of other posts or the readers that come this far and know better, and thanks for the time and study of the work. Help support the site with a share or comment. As always, grateful for the support.
