Away-Ink: The string is now a yarn. Part 1
Obscurity 1: The withholding of information is best done in a string’s nuances twisted into a string of layers.
Obscurity 2: A truth is there as the controlled nature of the string telling. Meaning the events or nuances of the string are presented in a desired order, even if the order is disordered. This allows the crucial information to be withheld and builds the anticipation and uncertainty in how the nuances come together, a mental puzzle being read through or watched.
Obscurity 1: Tension, suspense, and creating the psychological complexity of a living, breathing puzzle for viewing, regardless of the format. Gives way to unease if the nested ropes of the narrative are layered between two different strings. Leaving an audience to give extra thoughts and guess the meaning of the things going on. The illusion of discerning the truth of the layers. Making the string become a deeper disorientation as there is more than one string to guide through the mind. That cross-cutting of the strings builds the overall rope. Then add the further reaches as to where the trust can be placed by the viewer of the building rope.
Obscurity 2: The tension is amplified in the suspense of the parallelism. creating dramatic irony as the unknown of one is known by the audience and forgotten in the moment the other finds the answer. If the nested strings are twisting on the same strings, are they the same non-linear rope? Otherwise, the layers become something else to be had. Irony of the knowing being found out through mis happenings becomes a question of the mind’s thinking. Two strings twisting the same rope that are connected but only truly unconnected.
Obscurity 1: A strategic revelation in a withheld truth. The contextual context of the rope holding both strings is only known if the parallels of both are known from a seated outside view. Given a questioning mind, there is a need to understand more. But sometimes the view held is not the truth of what is seen. Just a mistake that leads the viewer in the wrong direction, allowing the twist of truth to be unseen.
Obscurity 2: The controlled revelation. Now that is a good place to start. a nested place where the view is guarded by the controller and slowly shown in the way it is wished. At least to those inside the rope. while the outside seated viewer of the ropes has context of the controller that is the focus of the rope. Thinking the string can only be seen by the controlled grouping. allowed to see all the parts.
Obscurity 1: Is that to mean the following viewpoint is an unreliable narrative to follow?
Obscurity 2: Known of what is known. A fly’s view is seated outside of the grouping, meaning a great amount is seen, then thought.
Obscurity 1: Now this was a proper debate of the contentious nature of a rope that twists strings into a viewer’s delight.
1st piece of puzzlement- Away-Ink: The string is now a yarn. Part 1
Executive 1: The show the editors gave to this board is a downright farce. The test subjects are displaced from the cyclorama or a cage and placed into a very clean, presented trailer of work. But the big test holds none of that footage. Instead, the two pets presented are beating the test that failed all the others in the trailer. It’s a mislead for the company to place the trailer and then give the answer.
Executive 2: But the vocal campaign that would build from that would be the best response. The free ads from the misleading would be overwhelming, to say the least.
Terry: A thought by the store. As the string of the mermaid changed to the name of Trawler. Was a fire sale of stock over the hate it got for the misrepresented word. The store was visited to see if there was a deeper reason for the change. Items were sold according to the reason why it was changed. Even though the change was a requested change by the leader of the three.
Executive 3: The three were the reason for the string? And which one would be the leader?
Jon: Yes. Vaticinator.
Executive 2: What of the first three?
Terry: Deposed of the first three, as requested. Now the three being worked with are noticed to be more shadowy and blurred. Why is that?
Executive 3: That is because the three were a part of the two tanks where the other pets came from. The lurking nature of the three gave the minds awaking experiences to the caged orb that is down the hall in this building. Which the current project seems to be doing in a speed run. That is not a want of the board.
Jon: Using a cage vs the tank to keep the awakening of the space from happening. and this allows the other pets in the store to be used.
Executive 2: The difference in the color is because of that.
Jon: It was a testing cage set into place by the Inkle. Along with a costume set of ants. So, the cage brought into the basement is not disrupted in the flow. It should become a colloquy of a dreaming space that can be mapped by the pets and used to disappear shadows that are breaking from the controlled vibe and frequency found to check the pets of the cage.
Executive 2: A cage is mapped by the pets of the store and the cyclorama sold. Would that allow more of a connection by the owners, seeing the same thing in the cycloramas at home?
Terry: Depending on the owner, yes.
Executive 3: How is that meant?
Terry: The pet is allowed to stay in the cyclorama and no knowledge of the outside or knowledge of the outside.
Executive 2: A haired loser life.
Executive 1: Well, the team of five can set things in a good direction. Was it done by a vote or another means? And next comment will be a HR visit.
Terry: The choice was made by debating the choices and twisting given choice into a single thought. This is the way the team is deciding the functions during this time. The choices of the debate are seen. As the end result here. Otherwise, footage of the pets walking would fill the screens of viewers, leaving a found footage feel to the project. A hope is placed that no change is coming.
2nd piece of puzzlement- Away-Ink: The string is now a yarn. Part 1
Terry: The question of the three was pushed aside in the meeting, or was it missed being said?
Jon: Have a bus to catch to the store. The meeting is going to be emailed later on. Watch that for the answer.
Terry: AH!
Worker 1: The string at the store is going to be done when?
Terry: It was done. Was Yegg not seen?
Worker 1: Hmmm… Then going to be at the store later to hear it.
Jon: Odd?
Terry: How was that odd?
Jon: That worker used to dislike the strings when working here.
Terry: Missing the thing that became a setting of the place.
Later on
Puzzlement
3rd piece of puzzlement- Away-Ink: The string is now a yarn. Part 1
Jon: Why was the bench so quiet?
Terry: Got to be one upper in the question game. Why is there a line for the closed store?
Jon: Easy waiting for the opening.
Terry: It’s a line for the register, not a door.
Jon: Well. WELL! Well! A new vendor?
Terry: Is this Inkle’s doing?
4th piece of puzzlement- Away-Ink: The string is now a yarn. Part 1
Unnamed: Hi, welcome to the No Tapping pet store. What can be done for the pets today?
Jon: (whispering) Is there more than three?
5th piece of puzzlement- Away-Ink: The string is now a yarn. Part 1
Jon: Is there anyone down here? Is there anyone at all? As the store was opened and the floor was full of vendees and…
Mitchel: There is no need for the musical to ask questions of the store floor. The “puddy” that was placed on the floor should be more than enough to handle the day.
Jon: That is the questioning? Where did the vendors come from?
Mitchel: “The Puddy vendor is akin to a hobnob. Or vaticinator, what was the word used?
Vaticinator: Familiar.
Jon: Okay, still lost.
Mitchel: The same as the ants in the costumes. Just restricted by the binder’s rules.
6th piece of puzzlement- Away-Ink: The string is now a yarn. Part 1
